History Channel’s “Gettysburg” is major disappointment

by Martha M. Boltz, Washington Times

VIENNA, Va, May 31, 2011 — I understand from friends that I deserve a commendation medal for lasting through the full two hours of the much-touted “Gettysburg” on the History Channel last night.

Many civil war buffs did not last more than twenty minutes before tuning out.

It’s a major indictment of a supposed documentary when the best part is the GEICO caveman commercial of his buddies playing Civil War re-enactors, complete with crocs and socks and modern technological pocket devices.

One can start at the top and go through it, itemizing the inaccuracies and second-rate acting and staging of “Gettysburg.” Suffice to say that Tony and Ridley Scott should go back to the entertainment movies they produced (“Gladiator,” “Black Hawk Down,” and “Top Gun,”), as well as the current TV show, “The Good Wife” on CBS, and forget trying to manage a Civil War documentary.

We can skip comment on the screw-top canteens, the erroneous insignia on hats and uniforms, the white haversacks and free-swinging cartridge boxes – all of which could have been avoided by consulting any of a number of books available on the subject of uniforms and accouterments.

The film obviously was filmed nowhere near Adams County, Pennsylvania, much less at the battlefield. The terrain was totally incorrect, the woods too heavy (remember a lot of the real place was farmland) and the “town” scenes looked nothing like the actual place.

One wit opined that it must have been filmed in Albania, with locals playing the soldiers!

Then, we get to the totally gratuitous and constant violence, most of which was out of context: the same man’s skull was split in half three different times. And, while Sgt. Amos Hummiston was in the battle and did die there holding the ambrotype of his three children, that’s ALL that is known of his life or wartime activities, in contrast to the bayonet wielding scenes in the program.

The characterizations left a lot to be desired, and only Gen. Dan Sickles came through with any degree of accuracy. There was no mention of Col. Joshua Chamberlain, who was one of the main protagonists those three days; Gen. Robert E. Lee was only “pictured” once, looking like a bad impersonation of himself, and riding a WHITE horse!!

Traveller, as most people are aware, was a gray or roan.

And, it was at this time that commentator, Hari Jones, intoned something about “Lee’s CALVARY not having arrived yet.”

The two main characters were Union Col. Rufus Dawes of the 6th Wisc. Regiment, Iron Brigade, who wore the same expression of bewilderment every time he was shown, and Confederate Gen. William Barksdale, who was part of General Longstreet’s Division, who charged Sickles’ position, resulting in the loss of 50% of his troops.

Yet-Longstreet was never even mentioned! Another notable for his absence was General George Pickett, as in Pickett’s Charge, characterized three times as an “epic” moment in the battle, but its leader was never shown.

Most of the commentating “experts” were from museums or organizations far north of the Mason-Dixon Line, which may account for the lopsided treatment of the battle. One of the few well-done aspects was the computer graphics animations of the various artillery components, explaining and showing how the pieces actually worked to inflict the most damage and greatest killing effect, in this, the “largest artillery barrage in the Western Hemisphere.”

The Confederates brought 160 cannon to the battle, in a line said to be two miles wide across the landscape, the Union having 100 of the mammoth killing machines. Some of the charges coming from Culp’s Hill and Cemetery Hill were impressive, but it was in the tight shots that inaccuracies and anomalies prevailed.

To someone viewing the documentary that knew nothing about the battle, they may have ended up with a slight glimmer of its importance. To any true Civil War devotee or reader, it was a waste of two hours.

I can hardly wait to see the next segment on “Lee and Grant,” Heaven help us all. It’s just sad that in an attempt to spotlight a major battle of the civil war, a program like this comes across as merely a dim bulb.

Follow the blog on Face Book and LinkedIn at Martha Boltz, and by email it’s [email protected]

About civilwarweek

Member - Minnesota Civil War Commemoration Task Force, Civil War reenactor and historian since 1993, holds Bachelor's Degree in History from Concordia University-St. Paul, currently pursuing Master's Degree in History at St. Cloud State University and is author of the forthcoming book, "Muskets and Memories: A Modern Man's Journey through the Civil War."
This entry was posted in Film and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply